Walk of Fame, Darkly
5by Andrew Tan
In Bukit Brown Cemetery, an avenue, like prime real estate, connects Singapore’s prominent families—all inter-related, as these powerful cliques were linked by arranged marriages to perpetuate their wealth and influence through six generations, during 150 years of British rule (1819 to 1959).
Chronology
1819-1867 Beginnings
The earliest Asian elites in Singapore were comprador-kapitans from Malacca, who brokered with European (mainly British) companies, exclusive credit and arms deals. To procure native products for Europeans, compradors resourced from powerful clan headmen who controlled the supply of coolie labour, ships, and native products—crucial to entrepot success. Business partnerships were tied by arranged marriages between all families.
Family examples: Tan Tock Seng and his family network supplied and distributed manufactures for the British “country traders”; they also married influential relatives of the compradors and Kapitan Cina. Together, this was the first powerful clique in Singapore, which broadened (after Singapore’s cessation as entrepot of the opium-arms trade following British victory over Qing China) to include revenue farmers and labour contractors as their enterprises penetrated Southeast Asia.
1867-1900 Rise
From 1867, with Singapore a crown colony, the long established families recruited scholars and professionals as sons-in-law, to perpetuate their vested interests (e.g. tax-free “free trade” policies, opium farms, colonial intervention in tin-rich Malaya) through positions in the advisory board and councils at the municipal, rural and legislative level; appointments rotated among relatives (who advised the Governor on nominations) to ensure advantageous policy continuity.
The immediate decades after Suez Canal opened in 1869 diverted oceanic traffic through Singapore. To compete internationally, merchant families pooled their resources into joint-venture consortiums (in steamships); their offspring intermarried too. Ties between in-laws counted more than paper contracts.
Family examples: Notable Queen scholars (Lim Boon Keng, Song Ong Siang etc) and other top professionals were sons-in-law of well established merchant-shipping families like the Wee-Ho Hong-Lee group, as well as others who partnered in Straits Steamship.
1900-1941 Peak
Insatiable demand for World War One commodities (tin, rubber) produced the first multi-millionaires in Singapore: these nouveaux-riches—their heirs and heiresses were courted and charmed by Old Money. Merging New Money with Old gave birth to multifamily-owned conglomerates (e.g. OCBC, UOB, Straits Steamship) tying together banks, ships, plantations, factories and newspapers.
Large fortunes would aggrandize social ambition: Plutocrats usurped collective and consular institutions (e.g. Ngee Ann Kongsi, Chinese Chambers of Commerce), to connect with powerful Chinese warlords of lucrative market potential, offering to regimes funds for schools and humanitarian relief, using family-controlled newspaper editorials to galvanize mass involvement.
Ability to lead the Chinese masses into action was recognized by the British military; however, these plutocrats on war councils were relocated with their families to India just weeks before the Japanese Occupation.
Family examples: Families from shipping, commodities, revenue farming, and remittances, co-founded the conglomerates of OCBC and UOB, with ties to the burgeoning sectors like film and publishing, and family connections in politics.
1945-1959 Turning Point
In postwar Singapore, enriched by military contracts in the Cold War, scions used their wealth to contest for elected self-government, but the expanded, impoverished electorate rejected these “rich men’s parties” (Progressive Party and Democratic Party, whose members were related, merged into the Liberal Socialist Party), in favour of a new regime, the People’s Action Party (PAP).
Family examples: Contracts were monopolized by consortiums who subcontracted to each other. Chain of suppliers for the British military coalesced and expanded to retail giants.
1959 onwards Decline
Following Singapore’s independence under the PAP, the old elites diminished in economic influence: their once-predominant, century-old monopoly of colonial contracts was overshadowed by the growth of public state-sector industries in partnership with foreign multinationals. Attrition too, their vast landholdings compulsorily acquired by the state for redevelopment.
Their hereditary clan-leadership in communities has been subsumed by government departments that fund and run all neighbourhood activities and amenities. More than cultural and community centres, clans were once the centre of powerful labour unions. They once ran schools; but today, the Education Ministry syllabus and compulsory mandarin has created a generation disconnected with their dialect heritage, previously stressed in clan schools.
Arranged marriages and pedigrees became obsolete as post-war mass education broadened careers and widened choices in life partners. Also, professionalization broke down class barriers. The Women’s Charter in 1961 ended the quasi-feudal family structure.
As Singapore developed to become a middle class society, a new breed of technocrats allied with the PAP replaced the Old Establishment.
A multifamily tree, with 1000 people from 100 families, 6 generations interlinked in strategic alliances from the late 1700s to now, will be published in 2012. I shed light on the influential cliques (made up of powerful families) who dominated Singapore’s society and economy past two hundred years. Andrew Tan
This thread has the making of a glove puppet presentation!
I received a question on my personal take of the legacy of these families to us today, and how Bukit Brown fits into this.
Singapore’s development past 200 years resulted from people cooperating across clans, dialects and geography. They formed family ties to solidify their alliances in business and politics.
This cemetery manifests such assembly of previously disparate interests, as clusters of families, united by ties of marriage, are grouped in proximity, far different from earlier burial practices where separate grounds exclusive to clans and dialects. As in life, people in Singapore united for economic and political reasons, whatever their cultural origin.
Most Asians who came here in the 1800s were sojourners, hoping to make their money and return successful. In reality, most eked out a bare existence and died in wretched conditions. To be entombed here meant the achievement of wealth and status, rarely acquired. Bukit Brown was the ultimate aspiration, the ultimate status symbol.
Thus, the Bukit Brown Story is rich in symbolism of our Singapore story narrative, our Singapore dream before the five C’s.
Hi Andrew. I’m working on a non-commercial calendar design project to promote the heritage of Dempsey Hill. Does this photo (http://a2o.nas.sg/picas/public/internetSearch/catalogueForm.jsp?command=loadUpdate&id=417639&thesaurusFlag=Y&simpleSearch=tanglin&photographOption=1&Submit=Submit) belong to you and, if so, can I have your permission to use it in the calendar? Drop me an email at shanshan@splash.sg
Thanks!
Ending footnote
Origins of the PAP elite: From well-connected Straits Chinese families, these individuals were highly educated and politically ambitious, astutely allying with the dialect-speaking leaders who commanded the support of the majority in the electorate – the Chinese working class. Together, they contested and won the election for self-government in 1959.
Once in power, the English-educated faction gained the confidence of the departing British colonials; in 1963, the leadership purged many of their former Chinese allies, whose radical socialism did not accord with Britain’s “Grand Design” (to maintain her economic and strategic influence in this region), but which also did not align with Singapore’s overall economic strategy, that of attracting financial investment from western multinationals to industrialise.
Henceforth, Singapore’s destiny lay in the hands of her new elite – rejuvenated periodically by recruiting loyal, scholar-technocrats from the civil service and military. Their network would extend to the private sector, by privatising state institutions to government-linked companies, where directorships awaited.